33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police should be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, be certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

Case regulation is specific to your jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. By way of example, a ruling inside of a California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this part for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

The ruling of your first court created case law that must be followed by other courts right until or Until both new regulation is created, or even a higher court rules differently.

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been achieved, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

We're an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States and this State.

On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and also the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for your dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Employment with DCFS.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a website court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.

twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.

The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could be a single or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for your decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted within an argument.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.